Whitepaper
  • 1.0 Introduction
    • 1.1 Migration from XEND to RWA
    • 1.2 New Vision - Xend V2 and Xend V3
      • 1.2.1 Principles overview
      • 1.2.2 Xend V2 & V3 - Roadmaps
      • 1.2.3 Xend V2 Roadmap
      • 1.2.4 Xend V3 Roadmap
  • 2.0 OAE - Onchain Assets Environment
    • 2.1 OAE Core Idea
    • 2.2 OAE Framework
    • 2.3 OAE - Products Overview
      • 2.3.1 Asset Chain
      • 2.3.2 Origin Studio
      • 2.3.3 Social Hub
      • 2.3.4 Xend Connect
      • 2.3.5 GOR
      • 2.3.6 Xend Solutions
    • 2.4 Asset Smart Contract
    • 2.5 IAC Framework
      • 2.5.1 Importance Of IAC to OAE
      • 2.5.2 (b) IAC in Practice
    • 2.6 Asset Credibility
      • 2.6.1 Authentication Rating
      • 2.6.2 Compliance Rating
      • 2.6.3 Asset Insurance Rating
      • 2.6.4 Events Mirroring
      • 2.6.5 Visual Summary
    • 2.7 IAC Partners
      • 2.7.1 IAC Provider
      • 2.7.2 Conflict Resolution Process
      • 2.7.3 I - AC Interdependence
    • 2.8 Assets Policy in OAE
      • 2.8.1 Web3 Token Issues
      • 2.8.2 AssetChain 10 Cardinal Rules
      • 2.8.3 Assets As Smart Contracts, Tokens As Rights
      • 2.8.4 Verifiable Legal Binding
      • 2.8.5 Intrinsic Legalization
      • 2.8.6 Multi-Level Asset & Token Structures
      • 2.8.7 Token Bonding
      • 2.8.8 Separating Ownership, Possession And Holding
      • 2.8.9 Structured Asset Administration Policy
    • 2.9 AssetChain - 4 Execution Levels
    • 2.10 P2P Lending In OAE
      • 2.10.1 Basics of P2P lending
      • 2.10.2 Appraisers And Custodians
      • 2.10.3 Xend Fundraising Platform On OAE
    • 2.11 AI Stack
      • 2.11.1 Watchdogs
      • 2.11.2 Assistants
      • 2.11.3 Improvers
      • 2.11.4 Concepts
  • 3.0 Xend Browser
    • 3.1 One-4-All
    • 3.2 NodeOs
    • 3.3 Subnet
    • 3.4 Explorer
    • 3.5 Node Enterprise
    • 3.6 e-Admin
    • 3.7 NodeBox
  • 4.0 Progressive Synchronization (V3)
    • 4.1 Objectives Of The IAC Councils
    • 4.2 Progressive Adoption Of Public AssetChains
    • 4.3 Progressive Adoption Of Public Subnets
    • 4.4 OAE Marketplace
  • Practical Use Cases
    • Business & Banking
    • Real Estates
    • Compliance - by - Design
    • Tokenization Beyond Ownership
    • Global Assets Accessibility
    • Green Impact
    • Software, Gaming and Entertainment
    • Global Transparency and E-Administration
  • RWA (OAE) Token Economy 1.0
    • RWA Token
    • RWA Economy Ecosystem Participants
    • RWA Staking
    • RWA Incentives
    • RWA LP Tokens, Market Makers, & Trading Competitions
    • Gamification Of OAE User Experience
    • RWA Token Utilities
    • OAE & RWA Macro-Economy
    • Future Legal Status Of RWA Tokens
  • Litepaper
    • Solving ASR Issue
    • OAE From User Standpoint
    • Xend Solutions
    • Future Roadmap
  • Appendices
    • Appendix A: Understanding RWA
      • Assets Classification
      • Narrow Understanding Of RWA
      • Wide Understanding Of RWA
      • UWA - Unreal World Asset
      • RWA versus UWA - They Key Difference Lies In Legal Context
      • Examples Of RWAs Definitions Incoherence
      • Key Takeaways
    • Appendix B: Digitization vs Tokenization
      • Existence vs Ownership
      • Hierarchy Of Terms
      • Digitation Of Asset
      • Documenting The Asset
      • Tokenization Of The Asset On Gen2 Blockchain
      • Legal Causality Of Gen2 Tokenized Asset
      • Key Takeaways
    • Appendix C: Rise Of AssetChains
      • Theses A
      • Theses B
      • Theses C
      • Theses D
      • Theses E
      • Theses F
    • Appendix D: Brief Analysis On Who Owns The Internet
    • Appendix E: Market Research
      • RWA Solutions - Scope Of Work Overview
        • Centralized
        • Decentralized
        • In-depth Scope Comparison
      • Statistics
        • CEFI - Territorial Coverage
        • CEFI - Funding Ranges Popularity
        • CEFI - Funding Values Breakdown
        • Visual Data Metrics
      • Research Summary
  • FAQs
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Appendices

Appendix C: Rise Of AssetChains

This research paper provides a comprehensive overview of our theses regarding the predicted impact and development of national blockchain systems, specifically focusing on implications related to macroeconomics, private finance sector, DEFI and Web3 industry and broader considerations regarding decentralization and digital national security.

Here's a simplified explanation of each section

  • National Blockchain and Its Macroeconomic Impact

Theses A1 - A19 detail how national blockchain systems could revolutionize digital security, economic management, and public administration. Key ideas include the escalation of cyber warfare prompting the creation of national blockchains, the widespread tokenization of real-world assets, and the decentralization of digital public administration. This section also discusses the potential for such systems to automate taxation, enhance macroeconomic management, and encourage global adoption through the example set by a pioneering country.

  • Impact on DEFI and Web3 Industry

Theses B1-B7 explore how national blockchains could reshape the current decentralized finance (DEFI) and Web3 landscape. Predictions include the decline of current stablecoins in favor of national ones, linked directly to central banks minters, the end of anonymous and decentralized blockchains, and the potential obsolescence of existing real-world asset (RWA) tokenization solutions.

  • Impact on the Private Finance Sector

Theses C1-C5 consider the implications for traditional banking and financial services, suggesting a shift toward decentralized lending and borrowing, a unified digital security system, and significant changes in compliance, insurance, and asset management practices. The integration of national blockchains is seen as a catalyst for profound changes in credit provision, customer identification, and asset transfer.

  • Re-Decentralization

Thesis D1-D2 criticize the current state of decentralization in finance as inadequate and propose a "re-decentralization" effort facilitated by national blockchains, aiming for a more transparent, accountable, and equitable system.

  • Hidden Potential of National-Decentralized Systems

Theses F1-F2 highlight the transformative potential of national decentralized systems beyond financial applications. They suggest improvements in data storage, internet domain management, emergency services, democratic processes, and more, advocating for a reimagined internet infrastructure free from current monopolies.

It's worth emphasizing that while detailed research data and justifications for each thesis were excluded from this paper and will not be published for now. The intention is to focus on sparking the discussion on the ideas behind these theses within the current and future community, rather than defocusing on numbers and data.

The aim is to gather feedback and insights on these ideas and use them as foundational layers for broader considerations in the paper. This approach invites collaborative thought and critical engagement from the community, leveraging collective wisdom to refine and expand upon these initial propositions.

PreviousKey TakeawaysNextTheses A

Last updated 1 year ago